In India, dealing volumes are swelling, and eight million investors currently hold a hundred billion rupees ($1.4 billion) in crypto-investments, in line with trade estimates. Regardless of how it's used, Bitcoin is consuming more and more energy. Without a centralized authority, the blockchain technology – the underlying technology on which Bitcoin is predicated – rests on a "consensus mechanism" to make sure trust across the network. Within the case of bitcoin, a consensus is achieved by the way called "Proof-of-Work" (POW), where computers (or miners) on the network compete with one another to unravel a posh mathematical puzzle. The law was designed to shield the additional fragile individuals like the old, migrants, those with disabilities, the agricultural, or those that don't have access to digital payments. 

An Energy Consumption Like Belgium 

It had been estimated that one Bitcoin transaction would require the maximum amount of energy because of the weekly consumption of a mean American household. Three years later, the energy demand is three times higher, and this has become a significant concern thanks to its impact on heating. It estimates that the footprint of one Bitcoin transaction generates over 300 kgCO2 (equivalent kilos of carbon dioxide) and requires 633 kWh of electricity or the facility consumption of an American household for 21 days. 

Crypto-miners monitor the cost of electricity because it constitutes approximately 60% of the operating costs. As a result, miners are heading to countries offering low-price – and not necessarily – low-emission electricity and cool temperatures (in colder environments, less energy is required to chill the servers). China remains the most important hub, but countries Canada, Iceland, Georgia, Sweden, and therefore the US attract more and more companies. it's also important to understand that Bitcoin is simply one cryptocurrency amongst many, which all of them consume electricity and leave a carbon footprint.