Home arrow Article arrow Article Detail

Distributed ledgers and the supremacy of money

Profile Image

Vandana Mrigwani Follow


Feb, 02 2021

Feb, 02 2021

likes | comments 0

Article Image

As of the late 1990s, monetary theorists have observed money overall and cash in specific as a standby for a publicly accessible and freely available record-keeping device. Ideally, cash could be traded by a public ledger recording all past and present dealings. 

Distributed ledger technology (DLT) is such a record-keeping method that can confirm trade without a central authority – but can it do so proficiently and more forcefully than traditional, centralized exchange? 


This paper scrutinizes the economic prospects and challenges of DLT, focusing on the strategic basics underlying its optimal design and its competence compared with a centrally achieved payment system. 

In permissioned DLT, a known system of designated validators can attach the distributed ledger via a majority or supermajority rule. This paper addresses the motivations validators need to withstand honest exchange. 


We find that under detailed circumstances, DLT may have an economic perspective in financial markets and payments due to improved strength and the possibly lower cost of realizing good governance in a decentralized network of validators associated with a central intermediary. 


We explore the economics and ideal design of "permissioned" distributed ledger technology (DLT) in a credit budget. Deprived of giving appropriate incentives to validators, yet, their records cannot be trusted as they cannot pledgto confirm trades and they can accept bribes to wrongly validate histories. 

Both frictions test the integrity of the ledger on which credit dealings rely. In this setting, we scrutinize the conditions under which the procedure of permissioned validation cares about the decentralized exchange as equilibrium, and examine the optimal design of the trade and validation devices. 

We resolve for the optimal fees, several validators, supermajority edge, and transaction size. Our outcomes suggest that a centralized ledger is expected to be superior unless weaknesses in the rule of law and contract execution necessitate a decentralized ledger. 

likes | comments 0

Profile Image

Vandana Mrigwani

CBW - External Analyst


Data Centre Construction - World First artificial intelligence AI-Tech Utility Token
DeFi Protocol SeaSwapSui Steals $32k From Investors

It was discovered by CeriK Alert that the decentralized exchange platform SeaSwap has scammed its users out of around $32,000 worth of SUI tokens;

Disclaimer: The information is for informational purposes only.​ This advertisement does not constitute financial advice or any other advice. You should consult with a financial professional to determine what may be best for your individual needs. None of the information and/or content available through this advertisement is intended as an offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or as a recommendation, endorsement, or sponsorship of any company, financial product, security or commodity. To the maximum extent permitted by law, we disclaim any and all liability in the event any information, commentary, analysis, opinions, advice and/or recommendations prove to be inaccurate, incomplete or unreliable or result in any investment or other losses. In Making the investment decision, investors must rely on their own examination of the issuer and the terms of the offerings, including the merits and risks involved. Investments are speculative, illiquid, and involve a high degree of risk , including the possible loss of investment.